Admit it, the Drug War is a Failure

In Free Societies Prohibitionist Laws Cause WAY MORE Harm than Good

After roughly 100 years of drug prohibition in Canada (Opium Act of 1908) we have not seen any appreciable change in the number of people who become addicted to drugs. And presumably that’s the whole reason for the drug war - end up with less drug addicts!

That means we’ve made no real progress after all those years of trying to “arrest-away” our drug problem. We in effect created the following black market crimes while seeing no results:

* Street level drug dealing by violent gangs (Triads, Mafia, Hells Angels, Native Gangs)
* Dangerous underground drug manufacturing in our neighborhoods (meth labs and grow ops)
* Massively large, highly profitable, and extremely violent international drug cartels (La Familia Michoachana, Gulf Cartel/Los Zetas, Sinaloa)
* Enrichment of our enemies (Taliban, Al-Qaeda) by establishing a black market for them to sell their narcotics
* Foreign policies towards drug producing countries cause huge rifts in foreign relations and creates international animosity.
* American government spending on drug law enforcement and related judicial process/imprisonment is costing tax payers 30 billion dollars a year (the US spent that much every year throughout the 90’s)
* When adjusting for inflation drug prices have dropped during prohibition
* Drug purity has increased during prohibition
* Children are now distributors of drugs
* Children are now a larger consumer of drugs
* Societal distrust in law enforcement has grown
* Law enforcement and political office has been corrupted by greed and influence
* Good intentioned laws enacted to tackle drug crime have ended up eroding everyone’s civil liberties without any appreciable effect on crime or addiction rates.
* Police and first responders being put in harms way day after day enforcing drug laws and tending to the victims in the streets.

I could go on and on if I wanted to. The impact of our failed drug policies are far reaching and impact each and every citizen. People try and put their heads in the sand and pretend that the issue of drug prohibition isn’t an issue that matters to them because they aren’t impacted. “I don’t smoke dope and I have bigger issues.” Well, if they actually took a moment to look at the issue they’d see that THEY ARE impacted. They end up with higher taxes, unsafe neighborhoods, children at higher risk of coming into contact with drugs, etc. etc.

When governments outlawed casinos they created a black market for gambling that had all the same issues we have with drug prohibition. Today the government runs legal casinos and by doing so have eliminated the prohibition caused harms. If you take a look into prostitution you’ll also see the same signs of prohibition caused harm. Harms that would not exist if we lifted the sex industry out of the black market.

So what have I concluded? I’ve concluded that in a free society like the US or Canada there is no way to enact prohibitionist policies and not cause more harm than simply allowing the activity to take place in a responsible manner by adults.

And on that note, I’m going to go find me a spliff and walk across the street to check out the “ladies of the evening". Thanks to prohibition it’s easy to find both at a reasonable price right outside my door.

Top 10 Reasons Why Legalizing Drugs Is Better Than the Status Quo

 

Drug prohibition has failed just like alcohol prohibition

1. The majority of street gangs are financed almost entirely by selling narcotics on the black market. A black market we created by criminalizing the drug trade in the first place. Reversing these well intentioned but devastatingly flawed drug laws will bring drug sales into a regulated legal marketplace. Criminals will no longer be involved in the drug trade when it no longer offers them a profit margin which will in turn weaken street gangs. Over time legalizing and regulating the drug trade will reverse the establishment of gangs as a normal part of our society.

2. Drugs are very inexpensive to produce yet on the black market their price includes a super high risk premium. This often forces the most severely addicted people to commit other crimes to get the money they need to feed their addiction. Even though the most severely addicted and most visible drug users (the ones in the alleys - the stereotypical addict) account for a very small percentage of the drug market they cause a disproportional amount of drug prohibition caused crime in our neighborhoods causing further cost to the non drug using tax payer.

3. Even though drug prices are hyper inflated on the black market compared to their cost to produce drug prices are falling while quality increases. Today drugs are more affordable than ever and more potent which is an economic indication that supply is high and the markets demand is being met by skilled manufacturers. This is a really good indicator that we are losing the war on drugs BIG TIME. Ending drug prohibition would usher in a system of production and distribution controls designed to keep price and quality under control.

4. Our drug laws are creating a lack of trust in law enforcement. This is best evidenced by the fact that the word narc is considered a bad word in almost all circles. Nobody wants to be called a narc. In my view nobody should have to avoid law enforcement contact because they use marijuana or have a hard drug addiction. Yet our current laws force people to hide their addiction and avoid police contact - this is clearly not what we intended when we passed our drug laws. Police should be viewed as a positive by people, due to drug laws they often are not.

5. Our drug laws are a leading cause of police and political corruption. The profits to be made in the drug trade are very enticing. Police and public leaders are as susceptible to greed as anyone else. We’re all human. Add to that, if a cop or politician feels like they or their family may be threatened by a criminal organization they will probably do whatever they are told to do just to stay alive. This corruption is caused by the illegal drug trade taking place on the black market that we created when we made drugs illegal.

6. Environmental damage is being caused by unregulated drug manufacturing. We’ve all seen the news stories about drug labs and pot farms that are throwing dangerous chemicals into our lakes, streams and other wilderness areas. What those news stories often neglect to mention is that all of this damage could be stopped if we regulated and monitored the production of these drugs. It’s the illegal black market production of these drugs that leads to the dangerous dumping. By monitoring the production we’d also be able to ensure quality and purity making the use of these drugs less deadly for the addict.

7. We finance terrorists and other enemies by outlawing drugs. This one is simple - we outlaw drugs, we outlaw the production of drugs, our enemies grow drugs, our enemies ship us drugs, we buy the drugs, we use the drugs, we get addicted to drugs, we fill our prisons with drug users, we have less money to fight our enemies and the drugs, our enemies make billions off the drugs. This cycle ends immediately upon ending drug prohibition.

8. Money that could be used to treat addicts gets spent chasing drug dealers and making them face justice. So instead of focusing our efforts on helping addicts we focus our resources on the punishment of dealers. You can see this by the abhorent lack of drug treatment facilities and addiction specialists compared to the number of drug cops, drug lawyers, drug courts, prisons guards, prisons, etc. The status quo will continue to harm addicts caught in the middle of the never ending cat and mouse game between gangs and cops.

9. Kids have greater access to drugs now then they did before drug prohibition. Ask any high school kid in any city if they could find drugs if they wanted them, and would it be easier than getting alcohol? You’ll get a resounding YES, YES. This is an epic failure for drug prohibition and should be enough of a reason to end it NOW.

10. Our current drug laws ignore the effectiveness of Government anti-smoking messages on cigarette packaging. If, with each and every purchase of a narcotic, the user was forced to stare the reality of drug abuse in the face through horrific images and scary text we might start to see some return on our drug use prevention tax dollars. Unfortunately, until we change our laws we will never be able to do this because the Government does not control drug distribution, and thus drug packaging - gangsters do. That’s why drugs are sold in clear zip lock baggies or flaps of white paper with cute characters drawn on them - with no health warnings to be seen.

Tainted cocaine - What would Jesus do?

What would Jesus do? End the drug war?

British Columbia has been dealing with a bad load of cocaine this year. Cocaine users have been getting sick with severe infections due to lowered white blood cell counts and weakened immune systems.

The cause is cocaine that has been stepped on (cut) with a de-worming agent called Levamisole. Authorities say it was likely added to the cocaine in its source Country - probably Columbia. Of course who really knows, we placed drugs on the black market where we have no ability to track these sorts of things. It’s impossible to know - just the way the drug cartels like it.

The tainted cocaine is not just a BC issue - this cocaine has been showing up all around the globe. Not to encourage drug trafficking but kudos to the traffickers for being so good at what they do. In spite of harsh international drug trafficking laws they moved a huge stash of coke all around the globe and into the hands of those demanding it. Once again prohibition fails.

Those who support continued prohibition and increased criminal penalties for drug use no doubt started making all sorts of “serves them right” statements upon hearing the tainted coke news story. I wonder if they would be doing so if it was one of their grand daughters who decided to try coke for the first time and ended up dead. I wonder if they may rethink their stance on drug laws when they realize that those laws did nothing to stop her from accessing coke and in the end made the coke she tried deadly. My guess is that they still wouldn’t blame prohibition and instead ask for harsher drug laws - which actually makes what happened to their grand daughter all the more likely to happen again to someone else’s family member. Good intentions, misguided actions.

Prohibitionists really need to step back, take a deep breath, and think. They need to realize that the vast majority of people who are actively trying to get drugs regulated and controlled by the government (notice I didn’t say legalized as that’s a loaded term) do so out of the same concerns that they have.

They have kids too. They live in the same neighborhoods. They go to the same schools. They care as much as you do about keeping people off drugs.

The difference is drug law reformers have paid attention to the harms that prohibition has caused in our society and haven’t turned a blind eye to it. They have recognized that drug abuse is very bad and must be avoided - but not at all costs. In comparison prohibitionists have the philosophy that drug use is very bad and must be avoided “at all costs". The problem is prohibitionists have never stopped and added up the true cost of prohibition.

A few of the costs off the top of my head:

* Policing drug crime
* Neighborhood grow ops and drug labs
* Impure unsafe product
* Unnecessary killings of civilians
* Corruption of public servants
* Easy access to drugs for kids
* Unsafe methods of ingestion
* Increased use of illegal prescription drugs
* Mistrust in law enforcement
* Enriching our terrorist enemies
* Clogging up the court system
* Over crowded prisons
* Destroying the environment
* Increased proliferation of gangsterism and related violence

Just to name a few!

All of these costs would not exist if drugs were legal. These are costs we created when we passed our drug laws. These costs are in addition to the cost of drug addiction on its own.

Now why would prohibitionists be willing to incur these costs? The most noble reason I can think of is because they acknowledge the harm drugs do to users and they want to avoid that from happening to other human beings. Very commendable.

If that is our noble reason for drug prohibition shouldn’t we also be showing the same compassion to people who become addicted to illegal drugs? I mean come on - if ending up addicted is so terrible that we add prohibitionist laws to our criminal code to avoid it shouldn’t we show a lot of compassion for those who are addicted? The compassion would come from the same place would it not? Why instead do we imprison the addicted and treat them as outcasts? Why do we have laws that make drugs more harmful than they already are and in some cases lethal for those who are addicted?

Another way of asking these questions is to ask “What would Jesus do with the drug war and the addicted?”

Would Jesus point his finger and scold addicts for being medically addicted to a harmful substance and then throw them in jail, ruin their chance at future employment, tear apart their family, and introduce them to all other sorts of evil people in prison?

I ask those who are supporting drug prohibition to take a look at what Jesus would do and see if it even comes close to what we’re doing with our drug laws. I think you’ll find that those trying to put an end to prohibition and its destructive unintended consequences are asking for the exact same thing Jesus would.

Amen.

(Jesus/pot graphic originally from Cannabis Culture)

:: Next >>